Lying During Federal Duty = Federal Felony

Lyin' Biden and similar Executive Branch officials like KJP, Mayorkas, Garland, Harris and more, who all practice doublespeak as their day job - you already know them as routine liars and frauds, but each time they tell an obvious lie during any official public duty, they rack up yet another federal felony crime perpetrated, and often it's actually more than just a single felony crime per incident, depending upon what all happened.

So tell you something you didn't already know, you say?  Okay...  Any mere individual citizen, with victim status related to such criminal lie(s), therefore has sufficient legal standing to invoke *mandatory* criminal prosecution against that government official.

To complete that picture, you need two (2) basic things.  You need any federal criminal statute that applies to the given incident, and there might well be more than one.  And you need to personally have legal standing related to the substance of that big lie told falsely by that official, so that you can then properly invoke your federal crime victim status, which then compels the mandatory criminal prosecution against that official.

The all-purpose is 18 USC 1001(a) ("Statements or entries generally").  This criminal statute, effectively limited to Executive Branch officials, forbids pretty much ANY lying or dishonesty of ANY kind - spoken or written - during any official governmental duty.

When ANY official (of any Branch) (federal, state or local) tells any significant lie while on public duty, and any manner of electronic device or electronic system is involved in transmission, broadcasting, recording and/or other furtherance in communication of that lie, then that government official is B/W guilty of federal felony Wire Fraud, 18 USC 1343, which carries a prison sentence up to 20 years plus fines up to $250,000 for *each* act.  Many officials are repeatedly guilty of this crime, and deserve prison.

The phrase "scheme or artifice to defraud" used within the Wire Fraud statute applies to government actors as Honest Services Fraud under the companion statute, 18 USC 1346, which states in full: "For the purposes of this chapter, the term "scheme or artifice to defraud" includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right to honest services."  Obviously all government must always provide honest services, as it cannot be otherwise.  Fairly recently in the case of Percoco v. United States, 598 U.S. 319 (2023), the SCOTUS held that although most honest-services fraud convictions involved public officials, private citizens may, in some cases, hold a necessary fiduciary duty to the public, and therefore be subject to criminal charge.

Legal experts would quickly point out that the Skilling test (Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. 358 (2010)) requires any involvement of bribes or kickbacks or similar by an undeceived third party.  This author would argue that the same legal triangle exists by any government official with a prominent public speaking role (on behalf of whatever part of government they represent) telling significant lies that are so important that they impact investors and the stock markets, political fundraising, and various other economic aspects on a national scale, and/or that such lies can illegally deplete our nation's public treasury, like falsely saying the border is secure when the raw extra cost of illegal immigrants is both staggering and otherwise completely unnecessary.

The reason that it IS all the same - legally speaking - is that at its core, the federal felony crime of Honest Services Fraud is about violating a fiduciary duty to the public.

Each time Karine Jean-Pierre enters the press room, she knows she is being recorded and broadcasted, i.e., she knows electronic communications are involved....  And so, each time she knowingly tells another major lie at the podium, such as saying that the border is secure, or that Biden has no cognitive issues, or whatever next big whopper spews from her lying mouth in yet another "scheme or artifice to defraud" all of the American people from honest services and the actual truth, she is then B/W guilty of yet another felony act of Wire Fraud, and this author argues she is also B/W guilty of Honest Services Fraud, plus guilty under the all-purpose 18 USC 1001(a), and so she should therefore be punished accordingly for all three of those federal felony crimes (except she can probably only be convicted on just one of the three charges, for each different incident, as the "elements" of each crime type are the same in her situation).

And so in similar manner, depending upon who the official is and what subject matter they publicly lied about, the respective federal crimes can be identified.  But that's not enough to force mandatory prosecution.  For that, you'll need to name at least two (2) officials caught within the same issue that has also violated any of your federal rights.

You will then file your federal lawsuit in the proper venue, which for high-level federal officials will be there in DC.  While your lawsuit will certainly include whatever grounds are normally applicable to the whatever big issue and factual circumstances, since you are claiming that your federal rights were injured in some related way, you will surely be invoking violations of various Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, but then also use the statutory companions which are often all applicable: 42 USC 1981 (violation of equal rights), 42 USC 1983 (deprivation of any rights), 42 USC 1985 (conspiracy to violate civil rights), and 42 USC 1986 (neglect to prevent civil rights violations).

And because you added claims under Section 1985 within your lawsuit against two (2) or more co-conspirators, now you can add your Motion for Criminal Prosecution under 42 USC 1987, which expressly commands the federal court "to institute prosecutions against all persons violating any of the provisions of section 1990 of this title or of sections 5506 to 5516 and 5518 to 5532 of the Revised Statutes, and to cause such persons to be arrested, and imprisoned or bailed, for trial before the court of the United States or the territorial court having cognizance of the offense."  Of course you have to point out that all those latter referenced sections are from Title LXX Chapter Seven of the Revised Statutes (various civil rights crimes) which were reorganized under various places of Title 18 of the newer United States Code, with many of those ending up under Chapter 13 ("Civil Rights"), while most of the election/voting crimes went elsewhere in Title 18.  At a minimum, you are particularly interested in 18 USC 241, which is section 5508 of the Revised Statutes, and possibly also in 18 USC 245, which is a merger of/from multiple of those same above referenced Revised Statutes.

And so viola!  Since you have by then clearly shown the federal court that two (2) or more co-conspirators have engaged in crimes against your federal rights (and surely also against the same rights of many millions of Americans), along with the law that expressly commands criminal prosecution to begin, the federal court has no choice.

You might also consider invoking your several rights under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA), 18 USC 3771, and/or your various rights under the Victims’ Rights and Restitution Act (VRRA), 34 USC 20141.  Since you are entitled, you might as well.

You're welcome.  Please use this power sparingly.  Only go after the worst of them.

--->>> Return to the Homepage/Sitemap <<<---

--->>> Give, Share, Support to help everyone faster <<<---